Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pouring rights contracts between universities and beverage companies: Provisions related to scientific research.
Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E; Grossman, Elyse R; Greenthal, Eva; Lucas, Stephanie A; Marx, Katherine; Ruffin, Martha.
Afiliação
  • Benjamin-Neelon SE; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
  • Grossman ER; Department of International Health, Division of Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
  • Greenthal E; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
  • Lucas SA; Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, DC 20005, United States.
  • Marx K; Lucas Consulting, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464, United States.
  • Ruffin M; Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, DC 20005, United States.
Prev Med Rep ; 28: 101897, 2022 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35855921
ABSTRACT
Pouring rights contracts between universities and beverage companies are common and grant companies the exclusive right to serve, sell, and market specific beverages on campuses. In exchange, universities receive financial payments and other incentives. At the same time, beverage industry-sponsored research at universities has increased. Pouring rights contracts may include provisions that allocate funds for or place limitations on scientific research. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed whether pouring rights contracts contained provisions that allocated funds for or placed limitations on scientific research. From 2019 to 2020, we obtained contracts through requests under public records laws from US universities (public, 4-year, ≥ 20,000 students) with contracts active 2018-2019. Of the 143 requests, 6 did not have contracts and 9 declined to provide contracts. Our final sample included 131 contracts from 124 universities in 38 states. Thirty contracts (22.9%) referenced research (18 Coke; 12 Pepsi). Three contracts (2.3%) included provisions that made direct grants or gifts of research funding, 3 (2.3%) permitted the university to acknowledge funding from competitors, and 26 (19.8%) allowed for research using beverages from competing companies. Given increases in industry-sponsored research, the absence of provisions that made direct grants or gifts of research funding suggests that sponsorship of research is occurring through other mechanisms. Additionally, universities must be able to acknowledge funding and conduct research on any beverage and should not need permission via contract provisions to do so. Future studies should consider practical implications of these provisions in pouring rights contracts and assess whether they facilitate or hinder research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article