Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Professionalism and clinical short answer question marking with machine learning.
Lam, Antoinette; Lam, Lydia; Blacketer, Charlotte; Parnis, Roger; Franke, Kyle; Wagner, Morganne; Wang, David; Tan, Yiran; Oakden-Rayner, Lauren; Gallagher, Steve; Perry, Seth W; Licinio, Julio; Symonds, Ian; Thomas, Josephine; Duggan, Paul; Bacchi, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Lam A; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Lam L; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Blacketer C; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Parnis R; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Franke K; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Wagner M; Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
  • Wang D; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Tan Y; State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
  • Oakden-Rayner L; University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Gallagher S; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Perry SW; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Licinio J; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Symonds I; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Thomas J; University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Duggan P; State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
  • Bacchi S; State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Intern Med J ; 52(7): 1268-1271, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35879236
ABSTRACT
Machine learning may assist in medical student evaluation. This study involved scoring short answer questions administered at three centres. Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers were particularly effective for professionalism question scoring (accuracy ranging from 41.6% to 92.5%). In the scoring of 3-mark professionalism questions, as compared with clinical questions, machine learning had a lower classification accuracy (P < 0.05). The role of machine learning in medical professionalism evaluation warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Profissionalismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Profissionalismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article