Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Creation of a tool to evaluate supportive care.
Giacchero, Damien; Buiret, Guillaume; Bartolini-Grosjean, Cécile; Taieb, Charles; Saghatchian, Mahasti; Krakowski, Ivan.
Afiliação
  • Giacchero D; Department of Medical Oncology, University Côte d'Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
  • Buiret G; Department of Otorhinolaryngology Surgery, Hospital of Valence, Valence, France.
  • Bartolini-Grosjean C; Department of Medical Oncology, University Côte d'Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
  • Taieb C; Patient Priority Department, European Market Maintenance Assessment, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France.
  • Saghatchian M; Department of Oncology, American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
  • Krakowski I; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
Palliat Support Care ; : 1-8, 2022 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913037
ABSTRACT
RATIONAL The absence of a specific tool to evaluate the impact of supportive care in general and socioesthetics (SE) in particular is undoubtedly at the origin of the lack of published research based on scientific standards.

OBJECTIVE:

We developed a supportive-care, patient-reported outcome questionnaire using the multistep methods, following COSMIN recommendations.

METHODS:

The Patient Centricity Questionnaire (PCQ) was developed using the standardized methodology for designing patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires according to the following

steps:

elaboration of the questionnaire, measurement properties of the questionnaire, internal and external validation, test-retest validation and translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and cognitive debriefing. A multidisciplinary work group was designed including professionals, such as physicians, public health experts, sociologists, supportive-care experts, and socioestheticians.

RESULTS:

Our questionnaire includes 11 items. It is scored by adding each Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], making it range from 0 to 110, with a higher benefit when the score is higher. The Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.88 for the entire questionnaire. As the questionnaire is a reflection of the patient's feelings, it is quite natural that the name "Patient Centricity Questionnaire" (PCQ) was retained and validated by the Scientific Committee. The PCQ correlated negatively and moderately with the Perceived Stress Scale [PSS], positively and moderately with the mental dimension of the Short Form-12, and poorly with the Well Beng 12 [WB12], the physical dimension of the SF-12, and the satisfaction VAS.

CONCLUSION:

Constructed according to the recommendations, the PCQ meets the prerequisite for this type of questionnaire. Its short format and simplicity of use allow it to be used by a large number of people. The PCQ is a simple, reliable, easy-to-use, and validated tool for research teams, making it possible for randomized studies to prove the impact of supportive care in general and SE in particular, on the patient's quality of life.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article