Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Major areas of interest of artificial intelligence research applied to health care administrative data: a scoping review.
Bukhtiyarova, Olga; Abderrazak, Amna; Chiu, Yohann; Sparano, Stephanie; Simard, Marc; Sirois, Caroline.
Afiliação
  • Bukhtiyarova O; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Abderrazak A; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Chiu Y; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Sparano S; Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Simard M; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Sirois C; Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Québec, QC, Canada.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 944516, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924057
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The ongoing collection of large medical data has created conditions for application of artificial intelligence (AI) in research. This scoping review aimed to identify major areas of interest of AI applied to health care administrative data.

Methods:

The search was performed in seven databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of science, IEEE, ICM digital library, and Compendex. We included articles published between January 2001 and March 2021, that described research with AI applied to medical diagnostics, pharmacotherapy, and health outcomes data. We screened the full text content and used natural language processing to automatically extract health areas of interest, principal AI methods, and names of medications.

Results:

Out of 14,864 articles, 343 were included. We determined ten areas of interest, the most common being health diagnostic or treatment outcome prediction (32%); representation of medical data, clinical pathways, and data temporality (i.e., transformation of raw medical data into compact and analysis-friendly format) (22%); and adverse drug effects, drug-drug interactions, and medication cascades (15%). Less attention has been devoted to areas such as health effects of polypharmacy (1%); and reinforcement learning (1%). The most common AI methods were decision trees, cluster analysis, random forests, and support vector machines. Most frequently mentioned medications included insulin, metformin, vitamins, acetaminophen, and heparin.

Conclusions:

The scoping review revealed the potential of AI application to health-related studies. However, several areas of interest in pharmacoepidemiology are sparsely reported, and the lack of details in studies related to pharmacotherapy suggests that AI could be used more optimally in pharmacoepidemiologic research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article