Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unpacking the design, implementation and uptake of community-integrated health care services: a critical realist synthesis.
Mukumbang, Ferdinand C; De Souza, Denise; Liu, Hueiming; Uribe, Gabriela; Moore, Corey; Fotheringham, Penelope; Eastwood, John G.
Afiliação
  • Mukumbang FC; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA mukumbang@gmail.com.
  • De Souza D; Ingham Institute, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Liu H; Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Uribe G; Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Moore C; Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Fotheringham P; Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Eastwood JG; The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health ; 7(8)2022 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35940630
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Community-integrated care initiatives are increasingly being used for social and health service delivery and show promising outcomes. Nevertheless, it is unclear what structures and underlining causal agents (generative mechanisms) are responsible for explaining how and why they work or not. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

Critical realist synthesis, a theory-driven approach to reviewing and synthesising literature based on the critical realist philosophy of science, underpinned the study. Two lenses guided our evidence synthesis, the community health system and the patient-focused perspective of integrated care. The realist synthesis was conducted through the following

steps:

(1) concept mining and framework formulation, (2) searching for and scrutinising the evidence, (3) extracting and synthesising the evidence (4) developing the narratives from causal explanatory theories, and (5) disseminate, implement and evaluate.

RESULTS:

Three programme theories, each aligning with three groups of stakeholders, were unearthed. At the systems level, three bundles of mechanisms were identified, that is, (1) commitment and motivation, (2) willingness to address integrated health concerns and (3) shared vision and goals. At the provider level, five bundles of mechanisms critical to the successful implementation of integrated care initiatives were abstracted, that is, (1) shared vision and buy-in, (2) shared learning and empowerment, (3) perceived usefulness, (4) trust and perceived support and (5) perceived role recognition and appreciation. At the user level, five bundles of mechanisms were identified, that is, (1) motivation, (2) perceived interpersonal trust, (3) user-empowerment, (4) perceived accessibility to required services and (5) self-efficacy and self-determination.

CONCLUSION:

We systematically captured mechanism-based explanatory models to inform practice communities on how and why community-integrated models work and under what health systems conditions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020210442.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Comunitária / Atenção à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Comunitária / Atenção à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article