Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Secondary intramedullary nailing for open tibial shaft fractures. Comparison of a one-stage versus two-stage surgical procedure.
Cheyrou-Lagreze, Adrien; Severyns, Mathieu; Rongieras, Frédéric; Germaneau, Arnaud; Odri, Guillaume-Anthony; Bertani, Antoine.
Afiliação
  • Cheyrou-Lagreze A; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique Pavillon E, CHU Édouard Herriot, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Severyns M; Service de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU La Meynard, Fort-de-France, Martinique; Institut Pprime Institut UP 3346, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. Electronic address: mathieu.severyns@hotmail.fr.
  • Rongieras F; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique Pavillon E, CHU Édouard Herriot, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Germaneau A; Institut Pprime Institut UP 3346, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Odri GA; Service de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU Lariboisière, Paris, France.
  • Bertani A; Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique Pavillon E, CHU Édouard Herriot, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 108(7): 103391, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35944868
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study was to compare the rates of radiological and clinical complications after sequential treatment of a tibial shaft fracture by external fixation followed by secondary nailing with an early-stage conversion (C1S) versus a two-stage late conversion (C2S). The hypothesis of this work was that treatment with C1S does not increase the risk of surgical site infections compared to C2S, and allows faster healing with a lower malunion rate. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We carried out a retrospective and comparative study based on the files of the traumatology department of the Édouard Herriot University Hospital in Lyon. We reviewed the records of patients who presented with a Gustilo grade 1, 2 or 3a open tibial fracture treated with external fixation with conversion by intramedullary nailing within 6 months from January 2010 to December 2020. We assessed the occurrence of Surgical Site Infections (SSI), consolidation time, time until resumption of weight bearing and the malunion rate.

RESULTS:

Of the 55 patients included, a C1S procedure was performed in 25 cases (45.5%) versus 30 cases (54.5%) for C2S. No significant difference was found concerning the occurrence of SSI after intramedullary nailing between the two groups (p=0.81). A significant difference was observed in terms of bone healing (p=0.036) and the malunion rate (0.0013) in favor of nailing in one stage.

DISCUSSION:

The strategy of converting an open leg fracture early, in one stage (C1S), after initial external fixator placement allows for faster healing and weight bearing, while ensuring a lower malunion rate compared to that of a late two-stage conversion. In the absence of a scar at the time of intramedullary nailing, C1S does not increase the risk of surgical site infections. While the choice of a late and sequential two-stage operation is likely related to the surgeon's apprehension around conversion of an open leg fracture by intramedullary nailing, this study could promote the use of C1S in a greater number of situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas / Fraturas Expostas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas / Fraturas Expostas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article