Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Versus Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The RIPCORD 2 Trial.
Stables, Rodney H; Mullen, Liam J; Elguindy, Mostafa; Nicholas, Zoe; Aboul-Enien, Yousra H; Kemp, Ian; O'Kane, Peter; Hobson, Alex; Johnson, Thomas W; Khan, Sohail Q; Wheatcroft, Stephen B; Garg, Scot; Zaman, Azfar G; Mamas, Mamas A; Nolan, James; Jadhav, Sachin; Berry, Colin; Watkins, Stuart; Hildick-Smith, David; Gunn, Julian; Conway, Dwayne; Hoye, Angels; Fazal, Iftikhar A; Hanratty, Colm G; De Bruyne, Bernard; Curzen, Nick.
Afiliação
  • Stables RH; Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.).
  • Mullen LJ; Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.).
  • Elguindy M; Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.).
  • Nicholas Z; Coronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton, UK (Z.N., N.C.).
  • Aboul-Enien YH; Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.).
  • Kemp I; Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.).
  • O'Kane P; Royal Bournemouth Hospital, UK (P.O.).
  • Hobson A; Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK (A.H.).
  • Johnson TW; Bristol Heart Institute, UK (T.W.J.).
  • Khan SQ; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (S.Q.K.).
  • Wheatcroft SB; Leeds General Infirmary, UK (S.B.W.).
  • Garg S; Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, UK (S.G.).
  • Zaman AG; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK (A.G.Z.).
  • Mamas MA; Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stroke-on-Trent, UK (M.A.M., J.N.).
  • Nolan J; Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stroke-on-Trent, UK (M.A.M., J.N.).
  • Jadhav S; City Hospital, Nottingham, UK (S.J.).
  • Berry C; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (C.B.).
  • Watkins S; Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK (S.W.).
  • Hildick-Smith D; Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S.).
  • Gunn J; Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK (J.G.).
  • Conway D; Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, UK (D.C.).
  • Hoye A; Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK (A.H.).
  • Fazal IA; Kings Mill Hospital, Mansfield, UK (I.A.F.).
  • Hanratty CG; Belfast City Hospital, UK (C.G.H.).
  • De Bruyne B; Cardiovascular Research Centre, Aalst, Belgium (B.D.B.).
  • Curzen N; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK (N.C.).
Circulation ; 146(9): 687-698, 2022 08 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35946404
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has an established role in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. We tested the hypothesis that, at the stage of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography, systematic FFR-guided assessment of coronary artery disease would be superior, in terms of resource use and quality of life, to assessment by angiography alone.

METHODS:

We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled trial in 17 UK centers, recruiting 1100 patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for the investigation of stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Patients were randomized to either angiography alone (angiography) or angiography with systematic pressure wire assessment of all epicardial vessels >2.25 mm in diameter (angiography+FFR). The coprimary outcomes assessed at 1 year were National Health Service hospital costs and quality of life. Prespecified secondary outcomes included clinical events.

RESULTS:

In the angiography+FFR arm, the median number of vessels examined was 4 (interquartile range, 3-5). The median hospital costs were similar angiography, £4136 (interquartile range, £2613-£7015); and angiography+FFR, £4510 (£2721-£7415; P=0.137). There was no difference in median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L angiography, 75 (interquartile range, 60-87); and angiography+FFR, 75 (interquartile range, 60-90; P=0.88). The number of clinical events was as follows deaths, 5 versus 8; strokes, 3 versus 4; myocardial infarctions, 23 versus 22; and unplanned revascularizations, 26 versus 33, with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% (48 of 552) for angiography versus 9.5% (52 of 548) for angiography+FFR (P=0.64).

CONCLUSIONS:

A strategy of systematic FFR assessment compared with angiography alone did not result in a significant reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life. REGISTRATION URL https//www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier NCT01070771.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article