Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours.
Perski, Olga; Keller, Jan; Kale, Dimitra; Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah; Schneider, Verena; Powell, Daniel; Naughton, Felix; Ten Hoor, Gill; Verboon, Peter; Kwasnicka, Dominika.
Afiliação
  • Perski O; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Keller J; Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Kale D; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Asare BY; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
  • Schneider V; Health Psychology, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Powell D; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Naughton F; Health Psychology, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Ten Hoor G; Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Verboon P; Behavioural and Implementation Science Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
  • Kwasnicka D; Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Health Psychol Rev ; 16(4): 576-601, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35975950
ABSTRACT
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Sedentário / Avaliação Momentânea Ecológica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Sedentário / Avaliação Momentânea Ecológica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article