Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review.
Campagna, Giuseppe; Panico, Giovanni; Lombisani, Andrea; Vacca, Lorenzo; Caramazza, Daniela; Scambia, Giovanni; Ercoli, Alfredo.
Afiliação
  • Campagna G; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Panico G; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Lombisani A; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Vacca L; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: lorenzo.vacca@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.
  • Caramazza D; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Scambia G; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Ercoli A; Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, PID Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Messina, Italy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 277: 57-70, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007356
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure. STUDY

DESIGN:

A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and subjective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re-operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, however grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article