Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Ratio of the Size of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm to That of the Unchanged Aorta as a Risk Factor for Its Rupture.
Jusko, Maciej; Kasprzak, Piotr; Majos, Alicja; Kuczmik, Waclaw.
Afiliação
  • Jusko M; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
  • Kasprzak P; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
  • Majos A; General and Transplant Surgery Department, Medical University of Lodz, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
  • Kuczmik W; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Biomedicines ; 10(8)2022 Aug 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36009543
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is a severe condition associated with high mortality. Currently, the most important criterion used to estimate the risk of its rupture is the size of the aneurysm, but due to patients' anatomical variability, many aneurysms have a high risk of rupture with a small aneurysm size. We asked ourselves whether individual differences in anatomy could be taken into account when assessing the risk of rupture.

METHODS:

Based on the CT scan image, aneurysm and normal aorta diameters were collected from 186 individuals and compared in patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. To take into account anatomical differences between patients, diameter ratios were calculated by dividing the aneurysm diameter by the diameter of the normal aorta at various heights, and then further comparisons were made.

RESULTS:

It was found that the calculated ratios differ between patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. This observation is also present in patients with small aneurysms, with its maximal size below the level that indicates the need for surgical treatment. For small aneurysms, the ratios help us to estimate the risk of rupture better than the maximum sac size (AUC 0.783 vs. 0.650).

CONCLUSIONS:

The calculated ratios appear to be a valuable feature to indicate which of the small aneurysms have a high risk of rupture. The obtained results suggest the need for further confirmation of their usefulness in subsequent groups of patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article