Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Microcurrent Therapy for Treating Pressure Ulcers in Older People: A Double-Blind, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Avendaño-Coy, Juan; Martín-Espinosa, Noelia M; Ladriñán-Maestro, Arturo; Gómez-Soriano, Julio; Suárez-Miranda, María Isabel; López-Muñoz, Purificación.
Afiliação
  • Avendaño-Coy J; Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
  • Martín-Espinosa NM; Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
  • Ladriñán-Maestro A; Rest Home Montes de Toledo, 45460 Manzaneque, Spain.
  • Gómez-Soriano J; Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
  • Suárez-Miranda MI; Nursing Home San Diego, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Spain.
  • López-Muñoz P; Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36011679
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of microcurrent therapy for healing pressure ulcers in aged people. A multicentric, randomized clinical trial was designed with a sham stimulation control. The experimental group received an intervention following a standardized protocol for curing ulcers combined with 10 h of microcurrent therapy daily for 25 days. The sham group received the same curing protocol plus a sham microcurrent stimulation. The studied healing-related variables were the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) and the surface, depth, grade, and number of ulcers that healed completely. Three evaluations were conducted pre-intervention (T1), 14 days following the start of the intervention (T2), and 1 day after the intervention was completed (T3). In total, 30 participants met the inclusion criteria (n = 15 in each group). The improvement in the PUSH at T2 and T3 was 16.8% (CI95% 0.5-33.1) and 25.3% (CI95% 7.6-43.0) greater in the experimental group versus the sham control, respectively. The reduction in the wound area at T2 and T3 was 20.1% (CI95% 5.2-35.0) and 28.6% (CI95% 11.9-45.3) greater in the experimental group versus the control, respectively. Microcurrent therapy improves the healing of pressure ulcers in older adults, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Varicosa / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Varicosa / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article