The optimal management of ruptured basilar artery dissecting aneurysms: a case series and scoping review.

ABSTRACT

The natural history of ruptured basilar artery dissecting aneurysms (BADAs) remains unclear compared to that of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). In this study, we investigated the natural history and optimal management of ruptured BADAs. We identified 17 patients with ruptured BADA among 4586 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated in seven participating hospitals. A scoping literature review was undertaken to investigate prognostic factors. Six patients among the profiled patients (35.3%) died, all with poor SAH grades (World Federation of Neurological Societies Grade IV and V). Rebleeding after admission was observed in three patients (17.6%) with poor SAH grades. Aggressive treatment and conservative management were initiated in seven and ten patients, respectively. Patients with good SAH grades had significantly higher favorable treatment outcomes than those with poor grades (83.3% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.005). Moreover, based on a scoping review of 158 cases with ruptured BADA, including the patients from our series, approximately 90% of patients with good SAH grades had favorable outcomes. A good SAH grade and no rebleeding after admission were favorable prognostic factors (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The rebleeding rates were 20.2%, 13.3%, and 6.3% for dilated, pearl and string, and stenotic lesions, respectively. We concluded that the natural history of isolated ruptured BADAs may be better than that of VADAs. Although definitive treatment, if possible, is undoubtedly important, conservative management with careful radiological follow-up for morphological changes might be a viable option for patients in good clinical condition and with non-dilated lesions.