Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable, Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Yu, Qian; Thapa, Nihal; Karani, Kunal; Navuluri, Rakesh; Ahmed, Osman; Van Ha, Thuong.
Afiliação
  • Yu Q; Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: qian.yu@uchospitals.edu.
  • Thapa N; Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State, Spokane, Washington.
  • Karani K; Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Navuluri R; Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Ahmed O; Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Van Ha T; Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 33(12): 1570-1577.e1, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100064
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Twenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS:

Before PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21-1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20-1.32; P = .167).

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimioembolização Terapêutica / Ablação por Cateter / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimioembolização Terapêutica / Ablação por Cateter / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article