Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopy and MRI for restaging early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.
Stijns, Rutger C H; Leijtens, Jeroen; de Graaf, Eelco; Bach, Simon P; Beets, Geerard; Bremers, Andre J A; Beets-Tan, Regina G H; de Wilt, Johannes H W.
Afiliação
  • Stijns RCH; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Leijtens J; Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands.
  • de Graaf E; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, The Netherlands.
  • Bach SP; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Beets G; Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bremers AJA; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Beets-Tan RGH; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Wilt JHW; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Colorectal Dis ; 25(2): 211-221, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104011
AIM: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has great potential to downstage rectal cancer. Response assessment has been investigated in locally advanced rectal cancer but not in early stage rectal cancer. The aim is to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy performed by surgical endoscopists compared to (diffusion-weighted, DWI) MRI only and a multimodal approach combining (DWI-)MRI and endoscopic information both analysed by an abdominal radiologist for response assessment in early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT for early distal rectal cancer (cT1-3 N0) followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery were included. Three separate reassessment groups were analysed for response assessment using endoscopic evaluation alone versus (DWI-)MRI alone versus the combination of endoscopy with (DWI-)MRI with a focus on sensitivity and specificity and analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Three cohorts (N = 36, N = 25 and N = 25, respectively) were analysed for response assessment. Of the endoscopy cohort, 16 of the 36 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve was 0.69 (0.66-0.74; pooled sensitivity 55.3%, pooled specificity 80.0%). Agreement for scoring separate endoscopic features was poor to moderate. Of the (DWI-)MRI cohort, 11 of the 25 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve for (DWI-)MRI alone was 0.55 (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 42.9%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved to 0.68 (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 75.0%) when (DWI-)MRI was combined with endoscopic information, with 11 out of 25 patients with a complete response. The most accurate response assessment was made by combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI with a high negative predictive value (90.9%). CONCLUSION: Good and complete responders after chemoradiation of early stage rectal cancer can be best assessed using a multimodality approach combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article