Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adherence to a risk-adapted screening strategy for prostate cancer: First results of the PROBASE trial.
Krilaviciute, Agne; Albers, Peter; Lakes, Jale; Radtke, Jan Philipp; Herkommer, Kathleen; Gschwend, Jürgen; Peters, Inga; Kuczyk, Markus; Koerber, Stefan A; Debus, Jürgen; Kristiansen, Glen; Schimmöller, Lars; Antoch, Gerald; Makowski, Marcus; Wacker, Frank; Schlemmer, Heinz; Benner, Axel; Giesel, Frederik; Siener, Roswitha; Arsov, Christian; Hadaschik, Boris; Becker, Nikolaus; Kaaks, Rudolf.
Afiliação
  • Krilaviciute A; Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Albers P; Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Lakes J; Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Radtke JP; Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Herkommer K; Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Gschwend J; Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munchen, Germany.
  • Peters I; Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munchen, Germany.
  • Kuczyk M; Department of Urology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Koerber SA; Department of Urology, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Debus J; Department of Urology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Kristiansen G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schimmöller L; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Antoch G; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Makowski M; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Wacker F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Schlemmer H; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University Munich, München, Germany.
  • Benner A; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Giesel F; Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Siener R; Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Arsov C; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Hadaschik B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Becker N; Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Kaaks R; Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Int J Cancer ; 152(5): 854-864, 2023 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36121664
ABSTRACT
PROBASE is a population-based, randomized trial of 46 495 German men recruited at age 45 to compare effects of risk-adapted prostate cancer (PCa) screening starting either immediately at age 45, or at a deferred age of 50 years. Based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, men are classified into risk groups with different screening intervals low-risk (<1.5 ng/ml, 5-yearly screening), intermediate-risk (1.5-2.99 ng/ml, 2 yearly), and high risk (>3 ng/ml, recommendation for immediate biopsy). Over the first 6 years of study participation, attendance rates to scheduled screening visits varied from 70.5% to 79.4%, depending on the study arm and risk group allocation, in addition 11.2% to 25.4% of men reported self-initiated PSA tests outside the PROBASE protocol. 38.5% of participants had a history of digital rectal examination or PSA testing prior to recruitment to PROBASE, frequently associated with family history of PCa. These men showed higher rates (33% to 57%, depending on subgroups) of self-initiated PSA testing in-between PROBASE screening rounds. In the high-risk groups (both arms), the biopsy acceptance rate was 64% overall, but was higher among men with screening PSA ≥4 ng/ml (>71%) and with PIRADS ≥3 findings upon multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) (>72%), compared with men with PSA ≥3 to 4 ng/ml (57%) or PIRADS score ≤ 2 (59%). Overall, PROBASE shows good acceptance of a risk-adapted PCa screening strategy in Germany. Implementation of such a strategy should be accompanied by a well-structured communication, to explain not only the benefits but also the harms of PSA screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Antígeno Prostático Específico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Antígeno Prostático Específico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article