Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
If You Pay, Will They Come? Evaluating the Impact of Subsidies on Cessation Outcomes in the Walk or Run to Quit Program.
Wunderlich, Kelly B; Do, Daniel; Martin, Hannah; Priebe, Carly S; Faulkner, Guy E J.
Afiliação
  • Wunderlich KB; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
  • Do D; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
  • Martin H; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
  • Priebe CS; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
  • Faulkner GEJ; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
J Smok Cessat ; 2022: 7929060, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36132710
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Exercise interventions may assist smoking cessation attempts. One such publicly available 10-week program, Walk or Run to Quit (WRTQ), demonstrated success in smoking cessation and physical activity (PA) outcomes. However, initial WRTQ participants (2016-2017) were fairly homogenous in their demographic profile. To increase diversity, subsidies for participation were offered in 2018. This study assessed how the subsidies affected participant demographics, running frequency, smoking cessation, intention to quit, and program attendance and completion.

Methods:

The $70 registration fee was subsidized for 41% of participants in 2018. A pre-postdesign was used, with participants completing surveys on their demographics and smoking and physical activity behaviours. Descriptive statistics compared the year subsidies were available (2018) and unsubsidized years (2016-2017) and subsidized and unsubsidized participants' data from 2018.

Results:

The 2018 participants had lower average attendance and program completion rates compared to 2016-2017 and no statistically significant differences in demographics or smoking cessation and PA outcomes. There were no differences in smoking cessation, run frequency, or demographic variables between the subsidized and unsubsidized participants in 2018.

Conclusions:

Offering subsidies did not diversify the participant profile. Subsidies did not have a negative impact on attendance nor primary outcomes. Subsidies may not have addressed barriers that prevented a more diverse sample from participating in WRTQ, such as program location, timing, and design. Equitable access to smoking cessation programs remains essential. As subsidies may play a role in reducing financial barriers disproportionately faced by marginalized groups, the implementation of, and recruitment for, such subsidized programs requires further investigation.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article