Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Composite Index Tagging for PVI in Paroxysmal AF: A Prospective, Multicenter Postapproval Study.
Di Biase, Luigi; Monir, George; Melby, Daniel; Tabereaux, Paul; Natale, Andrea; Manyam, Harish; Athill, Charles; Delaughter, Craig; Patel, Anshul; Gentlesk, Philip; Liu, Christopher; Arkles, Jeffrey; McElderry, Hugh Thomas; Osorio, Jose.
Afiliação
  • Di Biase L; Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology at the Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: dibbia@gmail.com.
  • Monir G; Arrhythmia and Ablation Center, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Melby D; Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Tabereaux P; Heart Center, Huntsville Hospital, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Natale A; Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Manyam H; Department of Cardiology, Erlanger Health System, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA.
  • Athill C; San Diego Cardiac Center Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Delaughter C; Texas Health Heart and Vascular Hospital Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
  • Patel A; Emory Arrhythmia Center, Emory St. Joseph's Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Gentlesk P; Department of Cardiology, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
  • Liu C; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
  • Arkles J; Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • McElderry HT; Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Osorio J; Alabama Cardiovascular Group, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 8(9): 1077-1089, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36137711
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)-guided ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated good short- and long-term success rates with low rates of complications in recent, predominantly European, studies. However, there is a lack of multicenter data from the United States.

OBJECTIVES:

This U.S. study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VS ablation using a contact force-sensing catheter for the treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

METHODS:

The prospective, nonrandomized VS postapproval study was conducted at 32 U.S. sites. Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation with recommended VS index targets (anterior, roof, or ridge 550; posterior or inferior 380). Additional non-pulmonary vein triggers were ablated at the investigators' discretion. Subjects were followed for 12 months, including a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was the primary adverse event rate up to 7 days postablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and an additional set of failure modes based on stringent monitoring (weekly transtelephonic monitoring [TTM] [day 91 through month 5], monthly TTM [months 6 to 12], and any symptomatic cardiac episode using TTM, plus electrocardiogram [at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months] with 24-hour Holter monitoring [12 months]).

RESULTS:

Of 283 patients enrolled, 261 had the catheter inserted and underwent ablation (safety cohort); 246 met all eligibility criteria (effectiveness cohort). Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.2 minutes. Mean amount of catheter-delivered fluid was 671 mL; only 18.0% of patients utilized a Foley catheter. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. The raw primary adverse event rate was 4.3% (14 events, n = 11). At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from primary effectiveness failure was 76.4%; estimates of 12-month freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter recurrence were 81.5% and 92.7% per stringent monitoring and standard-of-care monitoring (excluding TTM), respectively. The first-pass isolation rate was 83.1%, represented by no acute reconnection after the 30-minute waiting period. Freedom from repeat ablation at 12 months was 94.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The VS postapproval study confirms reproducibility of clinical safety and effectiveness of the standardized VS paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation workflow with >80% 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and first-pass isolation rate of 83.1%. Procedures were performed with minimal fluoroscopy. (Evaluation of VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module With External Processing Unit [EPU]; NCT03624881).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article