Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Omicron Subvariants: Clinical, Laboratory, and Cell Culture Characterization.
Morris, C Paul; Eldesouki, Raghda E; Sachithanandham, Jaiprasath; Fall, Amary; Norton, Julie M; Abdullah, Omar; Gallagher, Nicholas; Li, Maggie; Pekosz, Andrew; Klein, Eili Y; Mostafa, Heba H.
Afiliação
  • Morris CP; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Eldesouki RE; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health.
  • Sachithanandham J; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Fall A; Suez Canal University, School of Medicine, Department of Histology, Genetics unit, Egypt.
  • Norton JM; W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
  • Abdullah O; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Gallagher N; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Li M; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Pekosz A; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology.
  • Klein EY; W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
  • Mostafa HH; W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
medRxiv ; 2022 Sep 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36172137
ABSTRACT

Background:

The variant of concern, Omicron, has become the sole circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant for the past several months. Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5 evolved over the time, with BA.1 causing the largest wave of infections globally in December 2021- January 2022. In this study, we compare the clinical outcomes in patients infected with different Omicron subvariants and compare the relative viral loads, and recovery of infectious virus from upper respiratory specimens.

Methods:

SARS-CoV-2 positive remnant clinical specimens, diagnosed at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory between December 2021 and July 2022, were used for whole genome sequencing. The clinical outcomes of infections with Omicron subvariants were compared to infections with BA.1. Cycle threshold values (Ct) and the recovery of infectious virus on VeroTMPRSS2 cell line from clinical specimens were compared.

Results:

The BA.1 was associated with the largest increase in SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate and COVID-19 related hospitalizations at the Johns Hopkins system. After a peak in January cases fell in the spring, but the emergence of BA.2.12.1 followed by BA.5 in May 2022 led to an increase in case positivity and admissions. BA.1 infections had a lower mean Ct when compared to other Omicron subvariants. BA.5 samples had a greater likelihood of having infectious virus at Ct values less than 20.

Conclusions:

Omicron subvariants continue to associate with a relatively high positivity and admissions. The BA.5 infections are more while BA.2 infections are less likely to have infectious virus, suggesting potential differences in infectibility during the Omicron waves.

Funding:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C11061, NIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland department of health, and The Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare Network (MInD) under awards U01CK000589.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article