Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and suture-button fixation: can we predict nonunion early?
Teissier, Philippe; Bouhali, Haroun; Degeorge, Benjamin; Toffoli, Adriano; Teissier, Jacques.
Afiliação
  • Teissier P; Orthosud Shoulder Sport Unit, Clinique Saint-Jean Sud de France, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: phil.teissier@gmail.com.
  • Bouhali H; Orthosud Shoulder Sport Unit, Clinique Saint-Jean Sud de France, Montpellier, France.
  • Degeorge B; Orthosud Shoulder Sport Unit, Clinique Saint-Jean Sud de France, Montpellier, France.
  • Toffoli A; Orthosud Shoulder Sport Unit, Clinique Saint-Jean Sud de France, Montpellier, France.
  • Teissier J; Orthosud Shoulder Sport Unit, Clinique Saint-Jean Sud de France, Montpellier, France.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 32(3): 610-617, 2023 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206979
BACKGROUND: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is a technically challenging technique that provides well-known results. The first series reported fixation with screws. An alternative fixation technique has been proposed, using a button, to improve the reproducibility and to decrease the complications due to screws. The first reports using this fixation technique have yielded comparable rates of fusion. The objective of this study was to assess the fusion rate and bone modifications with this type of fixation. METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients were included in this prospective study. An arthroscopic Latarjet procedure, fixed with 1 button according to the Smith & Nephew technique, was performed by a single surgeon for the treatment of anterior instability. The radiographic protocol consisted of computed tomography scans at 3, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. We measured the coronal and sagittal positions of the bone block, distance between the bone block and the glenoid, diameter of the glenoid tunnel, fusion rate, and time to fusion. RESULTS: The position was deemed flush in 92.6% of cases in the coronal plane and under the equator in 87.5% of cases in the sagittal plane. At last follow-up, we observed 9 cases of nonunion (4%), as well as 18 cases of delayed fusion. The fusion rate was 92% at 3 months and 96% at 6 months. For bone blocks that ultimately healed, the diameter of the glenoid tunnel was <2 mm in 62% of cases at 3 weeks and <1 mm in 90% of cases at 3 months. Conversely, the diameter of this tunnel significantly increased and was >3 mm in all cases of delayed union or nonunion. CONCLUSION: The described technique achieved a reliable position of the bone block and a very good fusion rate with a new type of fixation. The time to obtain fusion can be lengthy, occurring between the third and sixth months. The diameter of the glenoid tunnel was the best predictive factor for fusion. Widening of the glenoid tunnel diameter >3 mm during the first 3 weeks was the most predictive factor for delayed union or nonunion of the bone block. This finding is probably explained by a sliding effect of the sutures through this tunnel, comparable to the bungee effect in anterior cruciate ligament repair in the knee.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Instabilidade Articular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Instabilidade Articular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article