Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reviewing birth experience following a high-risk pregnancy: A feasibility study.
Sigurðardóttir, Valgerður Lísa; Gamble, Jenny; Guðmundsdóttir, Berglind; Sveinsdóttir, Herdís; Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga.
Afiliação
  • Sigurðardóttir VL; Landspítali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík; Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. Electronic address: valgerds@hi.is.
  • Gamble J; Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia; Coventry University, England.
  • Guðmundsdóttir B; Landspítali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
  • Sveinsdóttir H; Landspítali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík; Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
  • Gottfreðsdóttir H; Landspítali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík; Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Midwifery ; 116: 103508, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36223663
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Complications during pregnancy and birth are known risk factors for negative birth experience. Women value the opportunity to review their birth experiences, but limited knowledge exists about appropriate interventions and the feasibility of providing this care for women following high-risk pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the construction and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a postpartum midwifery counselling intervention for women following high-risk pregnancies.

DESIGN:

A mixed-method study.

SETTING:

A high-risk antenatal outpatient clinic at Landspítali University Hospital in Reykjavík, Iceland. SAMPLE, RECRUITMENT AND DATA COLLECTION Thirty women who experienced high-risk pregnancies were invited to write about and review their birth experience with a known midwife 4-6 weeks postpartum. Eight midwives working in a high-risk antenatal clinic provided the intervention after a special training. Data including birth outcomes, birth experience and experience of the intervention were collected by questionnaires from women at two time points before and after the counselling intervention. Midwives providing the intervention completed diaries and participated in focus group interview to explore their experiences of the process. DATA

ANALYSIS:

Descriptive and content analysis.

FINDINGS:

Women and midwives perceived the intervention positively and feasible in this context. Midwives evaluated the pre-training program as helpful. Most women would like to review their birth experience with a midwife they know, 4-6 weeks postpartum. Almost half of the women wrote about their birth experiences. KEY

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings indicate that women experiencing high-risk pregnancies might benefit from a follow up by a midwife they know. Women and midwives perceived the counselling intervention as an acceptable and feasible option in maternity care. The training program sufficiently prepared the midwives to provide the counselling intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The findings provide an opportunity to offer the intervention on a larger scale to explore the effects further and subsequently implement into routine care after birth for high-risk women.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Materna / Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Materna / Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article