Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence of visual crossmodal reorganization positively relates to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users.
Paul, Brandon T; Bajin, Münir Demir; Uzelac, Mila; Chen, Joseph; Le, Trung; Lin, Vincent; Dimitrijevic, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Paul BT; Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada. btpaul@ryerson.ca.
  • Bajin MD; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
  • Uzelac M; Evaluative Clinical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
  • Chen J; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
  • Le T; Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.
  • Lin V; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
  • Dimitrijevic A; Faculty of Medicine, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 17749, 2022 10 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36273017
Deaf individuals who use a cochlear implant (CI) have remarkably different outcomes for auditory speech communication ability. One factor assumed to affect CI outcomes is visual crossmodal plasticity in auditory cortex, where deprived auditory regions begin to support non-auditory functions such as vision. Previous research has viewed crossmodal plasticity as harmful for speech outcomes for CI users if it interferes with sound processing, while others have demonstrated that plasticity related to visual language may be beneficial for speech recovery. To clarify, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain responses to a partial face speaking a silent single-syllable word (visual language) in 15 CI users and 13 age-matched typical-hearing controls. We used source analysis on EEG activity to measure crossmodal visual responses in auditory cortex and then compared them to CI users' speech-in-noise listening ability. CI users' brain response to the onset of the video stimulus (face) was larger than controls in left auditory cortex, consistent with crossmodal activation after deafness. CI users also produced a mixture of alpha (8-12 Hz) synchronization and desynchronization in auditory cortex while watching lip movement while controls instead showed desynchronization. CI users with higher speech scores had stronger crossmodal responses in auditory cortex to the onset of the video, but those with lower speech scores had increases in alpha power during lip movement in auditory areas. Therefore, evidence of crossmodal reorganization in CI users does not necessarily predict poor speech outcomes, and differences in crossmodal activation during lip reading may instead relate to strategies or differences that CI users use in audiovisual speech communication.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Surdez Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Surdez Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article