Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Evusheld in Immunocompromised Patients: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Najjar-Debbiny, Ronza; Gronich, Naomi; Weber, Gabriel; Stein, Nili; Saliba, Walid.
Afiliação
  • Najjar-Debbiny R; Infection Control and Prevention Unit, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center.
  • Gronich N; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.
  • Weber G; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.
  • Stein N; Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology.
  • Saliba W; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(6): 1067-1073, 2023 03 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310534
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab, a combined monoclonal antibody (Evusheld), was granted emergency use authorization for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) preexposure prophylaxis in individuals with immunocompromising conditions. In this study we used population-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of Evusheld in immunocompromised patients.

METHODS:

Using the computerized database of the largest healthcare provider in Israel, we identified all adult immunocompromised patients who were eligible to receive Evusheld (150 mg tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) on 15 February 2022. Patients with a documentation of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. A total of 703 patients who received Evusheld were propensity score matched, using a ratio of 14, with 2812 patients who had not received Evusheld (control group). Patients were followed through 30 June 2022 for up to 90 days for the first documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalization.

RESULTS:

Overall, 72 patients in the Evusheld group and 377 patients in the control group had SARS-CoV-2 infection, reflecting an incidence rate of 4.18 and 5.64 per 100 person-months, respectively. The hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] .58-.96) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 0.41 (95% CI .19-.89) for COVID-19-related hospitalization in the Evusheld group compared to the control group. The magnitude of relative risk reduction of each outcome was greater in nonobese patients (P for interaction = .020 and .045, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study suggests that Evusheld is effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization in immunocompromised patients. The effectiveness of this dose appears to be greater in nonobese patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article