Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic analysis of iris changes and a deep learning system for automated angle-closure classification based on AS-OCT videos.
Hao, Luoying; Hu, Yan; Xu, Yanwu; Fu, Huazhu; Miao, Hanpei; Zheng, Ce; Liu, Jiang.
Afiliação
  • Hao L; Research Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
  • Hu Y; School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Xu Y; Research Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
  • Fu H; Intelligent Healthcare Unit, Baidu, Beijing, China.
  • Miao H; Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Zheng C; Research Institute of Trustworthy Autonomous Systems and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
  • Liu J; Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhengce@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Eye Vis (Lond) ; 9(1): 41, 2022 Nov 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36333758
BACKGROUND: To study the association between dynamic iris change and primary angle-closure disease (PACD) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) videos and develop an automated deep learning system for angle-closure screening as well as validate its performance. METHODS: A total of 369 AS-OCT videos (19,940 frames)-159 angle-closure subjects and 210 normal controls (two datasets using different AS-OCT capturing devices)-were included. The correlation between iris changes (pupil constriction) and PACD was analyzed based on dynamic clinical parameters (pupil diameter) under the guidance of a senior ophthalmologist. A temporal network was then developed to learn discriminative temporal features from the videos. The datasets were randomly split into training, and test sets and fivefold stratified cross-validation were used to evaluate the performance. RESULTS: For dynamic clinical parameter evaluation, the mean velocity of pupil constriction (VPC) was significantly lower in angle-closure eyes (0.470 mm/s) than in normal eyes (0.571 mm/s) (P < 0.001), as was the acceleration of pupil constriction (APC, 3.512 mm/s2 vs. 5.256 mm/s2; P < 0.001). For our temporal network, the areas under the curve of the system using AS-OCT images, original AS-OCT videos, and aligned AS-OCT videos were 0.766 (95% CI: 0.610-0.923) vs. 0.820 (95% CI: 0.680-0.961) vs. 0.905 (95% CI: 0.802-1.000) (for Casia dataset) and 0.767 (95% CI: 0.620-0.914) vs. 0.837 (95% CI: 0.713-0.961) vs. 0.919 (95% CI: 0.831-1.000) (for Zeiss dataset). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed, comparatively, that the iris of angle-closure eyes stretches less in response to illumination than in normal eyes. Furthermore, the dynamic feature of iris motion could assist in angle-closure classification.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article