Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Focus on Radiation Protection Improves Both Correct Behavior and Procedural Performance During Simulation-Based Training - A Randomized Comparison.
Su, Peizhu; Zhu, Zhengrong; He, Jiawei; He, Rong; Feng, Huahai; Du, Pu; Lönn, Lars; Konge, Lars; Yin, Fang.
Afiliação
  • Su P; Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Academy for Medical Simulation (GAMS), Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhu Z; Department of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
  • He J; Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
  • He R; Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
  • Feng H; Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
  • Du P; Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
  • Lönn L; Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Konge L; Guangdong Academy for Medical Simulation (GAMS), Guangzhou, China; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: lars.ko
  • Yin F; Department of Post-graduate Education, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 89: 302-311, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36334895
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To explore whether simulation-based endovascular training with focus on radiation safety could improve correct behavior without jeopardizing the learning of procedural skills.

METHODS:

Twenty-four residents without previous endovascular experience completed 10 clinical scenarios on a virtual-reality endovascular simulator with software for peripheral endovascular interventions. Participants were randomized to receive feedback (n = 12) or not (n = 12) on radiation protection (RP) performance after each case. Expert assessments were done at the first, second, fourth, seventh, and 10th case on RP and endovascular skills (ES). Automatic simulator metrics on procedure time, contrast dose, handling errors, and estimated radiation exposure to patient and operator were registered. Outcome metrics were analyzed by two-way mixed analysis of variance pairwise comparisons with independent t-tests. Correlations were explored using Pearson's r for internal consistency reliability.

RESULTS:

The RP performance was similar in both groups at their first attempt (P = 0.61), but the feedback group significantly outperformed the control group over time (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The feedback group was however slower to learn the ES at start (P = 0.047 at second performance), but after 7 attempts no difference was shown (P = 0.59). The feedback group used more time (19.5 vs. 15.3 min; P = 0.007) but less contrast (60 vs. 100 mL; P < 0.001). The number of errors was the same in both groups, but all metrics regarding radiation exposure favored the feedback group (P-values from 0.001 to 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

Simulation-based training (SBT) is effective to acquire basic endovascular intervention skills and concurrently learn RP behavior when feedback on radiation culture is provided.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article