Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation for heart rate control evaluated in the Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart.
Haberbusch, Max; Kronsteiner, Bettina; Kramer, Anne-Margarethe; Kiss, Attila; Podesser, Bruno K; Moscato, Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Haberbusch M; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. max.haberbusch@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Kronsteiner B; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Vienna, Austria. max.haberbusch@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Kramer AM; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kiss A; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Vienna, Austria.
  • Podesser BK; Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Moscato F; Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 18794, 2022 11 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36335207
ABSTRACT
Persistent sinus tachycardia substantially increases the risk of cardiac death. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is known to reduce the heart rate, and hence may be a non-pharmacological alternative for the management of persistent sinus tachycardia. To precisely regulate the heart rate using VNS, closed-loop control strategies are needed. Therefore, in this work, we developed two closed-loop VNS strategies using an in-silico model of the cardiovascular system. Both strategies employ a proportional-integral controller that operates on the current amplitude. While one control strategy continuously delivers stimulation pulses to the vagus nerve, the other applies bursts of stimuli in synchronization with the cardiac cycle. Both were evaluated in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 6) with intact vagal innervation. The controller performance was quantified by rise time (Tr), steady-state error (SSE), and percentual overshoot amplitude (%OS). In the ex-vivo setting, the cardiac-synchronized variant resulted in Tr = 10.7 ± 4.5 s, SSE = 12.7 ± 9.9 bpm and %OS = 5.1 ± 3.6% while continuous stimulation led to Tr = 10.2 ± 5.6 s, SSE = 10 ± 6.7 bpm and %OS = 3.2 ± 1.9%. Overall, both strategies produced a satisfying and reproducible performance, highlighting their potential use in persistent sinus tachycardia.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação do Nervo Vago Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação do Nervo Vago Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article