A decade of blood-brain barrier permeability assays: Revisiting old traumatic brain injury rat data for new insights and experimental design.

Increased microvascular permeability at the level of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) often leads to vasogenic brain edema following traumatic brain injury (TBI). These pathologic conditions compromise the integrity of the neurovascular unit resulting in severe brain dysfunction. To quantify this permeability and assess ionic equillibrium, preclinical researchers have relied on the use of various molecular weight permeable dyes such as Evans Blue that normally cannot enter the brain parenchyma under homeostatic conditions. Evans Blue, the most cited of the molecular weight dyes, has reported reproducibility issues because of harsh extraction processes, suboptimal detection via absorbance, and wide excitation fluorescence spectra associated with the dye. Our laboratory group transitioned to Alexa Fluor 680, a far-red dye with improved sensitivity compared to Evans Blue and thus improved reproducibility to alleviate this issue. To evaluate our reproducibility and increase the rigor of our experimental design, we retrospectively analyzed our controlled cortical impact (CCI) experiments over the past 10 years to evaluate effect size with larger samples and potential sources of variability. All of our BBB permeability experiments were performed with Male, Sprague Dawley rats weighing between 225 and 300 g. Historically, Sprague Dawleys were randomly divided into treatment groups: SHAM, CCI, and a stem cell-based treatment from years 2007-2020. The assessment of microvascular hyperpermeability were evaluated by comparing the mean at minimum threshold, area at 1 k-2 k, and intensity density obtained from Alexa Fluor 680 permeability data. Studies utilizing Evans Blue were further compared by tip depth, diameter size, and the hemisphere of injury. Statistical evaluation utilizing the G Power software analysis did not yield a significant difference in sample size comparing experimental groups for Evans Blue and Alexa Fluor 680 analyzed brain tissue. Our analysis also demonstrated a trend in that recent studies (years 2018-2020) have yielded more compact sample sizes between experimental groups in Alexa Fluor 680 analyzed rats. This retrospective study further revealed that Alexa Fluor 680 image analysis provides greater sensitivity to BBB permeability following TBI in comparison to Evans Blue. Significant differences in sample size were not detected between Evans Blue and Alexa Fluor 680; there were significant differences found throughout year to year analysis at the lower range of thresholds. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This work provides a comparative analysis of BBB permeability assay techniques after CCI model of injury in rats.