Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effectiveness of Neuromobilization in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Paraskevopoulos, Eleftherios; Koumantakis, George; Papandreou, Maria.
Afiliação
  • Paraskevopoulos E; Laboratory of Advanced Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Athens,Greece.
  • Koumantakis G; Laboratory of Advanced Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Athens,Greece.
  • Papandreou M; Laboratory of Advanced Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Athens,Greece.
J Sport Rehabil ; 32(3): 325-334, 2023 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36395760
CONTEXT: Neuromobilization exercises (NE) could be a useful therapeutic tool to induce analgesia and increase function and range of motion (ROM) in patients with musculoskeletal pathologies with neuropathic components; however, the effectiveness of this intervention in patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of NE in CR on pain, function, and ROM. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, Scopus, PEDro, and EBSCO databases from inception until June 2022. The authors included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of NE against control groups or other interventions that aimed to treat patients with CR. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seven clinical trials met the eligibility criteria, and for the quantitative synthesis, 5 studies were included. For the studies that compared NE with a control group, the standardized mean difference for pain was -1.33/10 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.80 to -0.86; P < .01; I2 = 0%), for function with the Neck Disability Index was -1.21/50 (95% CI, -1.67 to -0.75; P < .01; I2 = 0%), and for neck flexion and extensions was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.23 to 1.10; P < .01; I2 = 0%) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.90; P < .01; I2 = 0%), respectively, with evidence of clinical effectiveness. These findings were based on moderate-quality evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating. In studies that compared NE with other interventions, the meta-analysis failed to demonstrate the statistical or clinical superiority of NE. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate quality of evidence suggests that NE may be superior to no treatment for pain, function, and ROM in patients with CR. In contrast, NE are not superior to other interventions in the same outcomes, based on low- to very low-quality evidence. More high-quality research is needed to assess the consistency of these results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiculopatia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiculopatia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article