Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inter-expert agreement on indications for antibiotic therapy in older adults admitted to French hospital through an emergency department.
Coulongeat, Matthieu; Polisset, Nathalie; Poitau, Fanny; Laurent, Emeline; Fougère, Bertrand; Lemaignen, Adrien.
Afiliação
  • Coulongeat M; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France.
  • Polisset N; Tours University Medical Center, Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé 37044 TOURS, France.
  • Poitau F; Tours University Medical Center, Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé 37044 TOURS, France.
  • Laurent E; Emergency Department, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France.
  • Fougère B; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Medical Center, Tours, France.
  • Lemaignen A; Tours University Medical Center, Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé 37044 TOURS, France.
Heliyon ; 8(11): e11630, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36411926
ABSTRACT

Background:

Around one third of older adults with infections have an atypical presentation upon admission to an emergency department (ED).

Objective:

To evaluate the level of agreement between experts from several disciplines on the indication for antibiotic therapy for a bacterial infection in older patients presenting at an ED, and to describe the characteristics of the infections.

Methods:

Based on comprehensive medical records, three experts (a geriatrician, an emergency physician (EP), and an infectious disease specialist (IDS)) determined independently and then jointly whether a patient presenting at the ED had a bacterial infection requiring antibiotic therapy. Inter-expert agreement was expressed as a fixed-marginal Fleiss' kappa (κ).

Results:

Of the 444 medical records included, the consensus meeting found that 114 (25.7%) had an indication for antibiotics, 327 (73.6%) did not have an indication, and 3 could not be classified. The overall level of agreement was 85.2%, and κ[95%CI] was 0.64 [0.57-0.72] (p < 0.001). The level of agreement between the geriatrician and the IDS (89.41%, κ0.73, 95%CI [0.62-0.85] (p < 0.001)) was higher than that between the geriatrician and the EP (83.56%, κ0.62, 95%CI [0.51-0.73] (p < 0.001)) and between the IDS and the EP (82.66%, κ0.59, 95%CI [0.48-0.70] (p < 0.001)). The levels of agreement between the final adjudication, was higher for the geriatrician, and IDS respectively 94.1% (κ0.85, 95%CI [0.74-0.97] (p < 0.001) and 94.4% (κ0.86, 95%CI [0.74-0.97] (p < 0.001)). 114 (25.7%) patients had a bacterial infection (mostly lung infections (n = 55, 48.2%) and urinary tract infections (n = 25, 21.9%)), and 28 patients (6.3%) had a viral infection.

Conclusion:

Our results highlighted substantial agreement between members of a multidisciplinary expert panel.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article