Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do age and language impairment affect speed of recognition for words with high and low closeness centrality within the phonological network?
Nguyen, Thuy Anh Sally; Castro, Nichol; Vitevitch, Michael S; Harding, Annabel; Teng, Renata; Arciuli, Joanne; Leyton, Cristian E; Piguet, Olivier; Ballard, Kirrie J.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen TAS; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Castro N; Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Vitevitch MS; Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
  • Harding A; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Teng R; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Arciuli J; College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Leyton CE; School of Psychology and the Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Piguet O; School of Psychology and the Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Ballard KJ; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol ; : 1-14, 2022 Nov 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416187
Purpose: Speed and accuracy of lexical access change with healthy ageing and neurodegeneration. While a word's immediate phonological neighbourhood density (i.e. words differing by a single phoneme) influences access, connectivity to all words in the phonological network (i.e. closeness centrality) may influence processing. This study aimed to investigate the effect of closeness centrality on speed and accuracy of lexical processing pre- and post- a single word-training session in healthy younger and older adults, and adults with logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), which affects phonological processing.Method: Participants included 29 young and 17 older healthy controls, and 10 adults with lvPPA. Participants received one session of word-training on words with high or low closeness centrality, using a picture-word verification task. Changes in lexical decision reaction times (RT) and accuracy were measured.Result: Baseline RT was unaffected by age and accuracy was at ceiling for controls. Post-training, only young adults' RT were significantly faster. Adults with lvPPA were slower and less accurate than controls at baseline, with no training effect. Closeness centrality did not influence performance.Conclusion: Absence of training effect for older adults suggests higher threshold to induce priming, possibly associated with insufficient dosage or fatigue. Implications for word-finding interventions with older adults are discussed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article