Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain: 2022 Update.
Kambadakone, Avinash R; Santillan, Cynthia S; Kim, David H; Fowler, Kathryn J; Birkholz, James H; Camacho, Marc A; Cash, Brooks D; Dane, Bari; Felker, Robin A; Grossman, Eric J; Korngold, Elena K; Liu, Peter S; Marin, Daniele; McCrary, Marion; Pietryga, Jason A; Weinstein, Stefanie; Zukotynski, Katherine; Carucci, Laura R.
Afiliação
  • Kambadakone AR; Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Medical Director, Martha's Vineyard Hospital Imaging. Electronic address: akambadakone@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Santillan CS; Vice Chair of Clinical Operations, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • Kim DH; Panel Chair; Vice Chair of Education, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Fowler KJ; Panel Vice-Chair, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California. ACR LI-RADS; Division Chief, SAR Portfolio Director; RSNA Radiology Senior DE.
  • Birkholz JH; Divisional Director, Quality and Safety (Abdominal Imaging), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Radiology Representative to the Interdisciplinary Dysmotility (GIMIG) Conference.
  • Camacho MA; The University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER.
  • Cash BD; Chief of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Division, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association.
  • Dane B; Director of Body CT, Abdominal Imaging; Director of Quality and Safety Outpatient Imaging, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Felker RA; Associate Clerkship Director for Internal Medicine, Georgetown University; Primary care physician, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Grossman EJ; Medical Director, Multi-Specialty Clinic, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, California; American College of Surgeons.
  • Korngold EK; Section Chief, Body Imaging, Chair, Department of Radiology Promotion and Tenure Committee, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Liu PS; Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Marin D; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • McCrary M; Associate Director of Duke GME Coaching, Duke Signature Care, Durham, North Carolina; American College of Physicians; Governor-Elect, American College of Physicians North Carolina Chapter.
  • Pietryga JA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Weinstein S; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Zukotynski K; Co-Associate Chair for Research, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
  • Carucci LR; Specialty Chair; Section Chief Abdominal Imaging, Director of MRI and CT, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(11S): S445-S461, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436969
This document focuses on imaging in the adult and pregnant populations with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, including patients with fever and leukocytosis. Appendicitis remains the most common surgical pathology responsible for RLQ abdominal pain in the United States. Other causes of RLQ pain include right colonic diverticulitis, ureteral stone, and infectious enterocolitis. Appropriate imaging in the diagnosis of appendicitis has resulted in decreased negative appendectomy rate from as high as 25% to approximately 1% to 3%. Contrast-enhanced CT remains the primary and most appropriate imaging modality to evaluate this patient population. MRI is approaching CT in sensitivity and specificity as this technology becomes more widely available and utilization increases. Unenhanced MRI and ultrasound remain the diagnostic procedures of choice in the pregnant patient. MRI and ultrasound continue to perform best in the hands of the experts. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article