Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
Boaitey, Kwame Peprah; Bakhit, Mina; Krzyzaniak, Natalia; Hoffmann, Tammy C.
Afiliação
  • Boaitey KP; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, 14 University Dr, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia. kboaitey@bond.edu.au.
  • Bakhit M; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, 14 University Dr, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
  • Krzyzaniak N; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, 14 University Dr, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
  • Hoffmann TC; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, 14 University Dr, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 897, 2022 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456959
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many of the acute infections that are seen in primary care and sometimes managed with antibiotics are self-resolving and antibiotics may be unnecessary. Information about the natural history of these infections underpins antibiotic stewardship strategies such as delayed prescribing and shared decision making, yet whether it's reported in guidelines is unknown. We examined, in clinical guidelines, the reporting of natural history information and relevant antibiotic stewardship strategies for acute infections commonly seen in primary care.

METHODS:

A systematic review of national and international guidelines (2010 onwards), available electronically, for managing acute infections (respiratory, urinary, or skin and soft tissue). We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, TRIP, and GIN databases and websites of 22 guideline-publishing organisations.

RESULTS:

We identified 82 guidelines, covering 114 eligible infections. Natural history information was reported in 49 (59.8%) of the guidelines and 66 (57.9%) of the reported conditions, most commonly for respiratory tract infections. Quantitative information about the expected infection duration was provided for 63.5% (n = 42) of the infections. Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategy was recommended for 34.2% (n = 39) of them and shared decision making for 21% (n = 24).

CONCLUSIONS:

Just over half of the guidelines for acute infections that are commonly managed in primary care and sometimes with antibiotics contained natural history information. As many of these infections spontaneously improve, this is a missed opportunity to disseminate this information to clinicians, promote antibiotic stewardship, and facilitate conversations with patients and informed decision making. Systematic review registration CRD42021247048.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Gestão de Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Gestão de Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article