Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Specific local nasal immunotherapy: Single center experience on 324 patients.
Scarpa, Alfonso; De Luca, Pietro; Marra, Pasquale; Bisogno, Antonella; Salzano, Giovanni; Ricciardiello, Filippo; Capasso, Pasquale; Romano, Domenico; Viola, Pasquale; Ralli, Massimo; Di Stadio, Arianna; Salzano, Francesco Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Scarpa A; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy. Electronic address: ascarpa@unisa.it.
  • De Luca P; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
  • Marra P; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
  • Bisogno A; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
  • Salzano G; Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Ricciardiello F; Ear, Nose, and Throat Unit, AORN "Antonio Cardarelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Capasso P; Otolaryngology Unit, AORN dei Colli, V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
  • Romano D; Otolaryngology Unit "Ascalesi" Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
  • Viola P; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Audiology, Regional Centre for Cochlear Implants and ENT Diseases, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Ralli M; Department of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Stadio A; Department GF Ingrassia, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
  • Salzano FA; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103694, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36473264
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of specific local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) in patients with allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective single-center study of 324 patients with allergic rhinitis (191 allergic to mites, 133 allergic to Grarninaceae or Parietaria pollen) treated with specific LNIT was carried out. As control group, 158 patients without allergic rhinitis were enrolled. All patients were evaluated before and after 32 weeks of treatment by subjective analysis of their self-reported symptoms and by objective analysis of nasal provocation test, nasal resistance by anterior rhinomanometry, and mucociliary clearance time.

RESULTS:

Clinical efficacy of LNIT for allergy to mites and pollens was confirmed by the differences in the symptoms score between the active group and the placebo group. The nasal provocation test and the rhinomanometric analysis confirm the result with a difference statistically significant. No differnces in mucociliary clearance time were found.

CONCLUSIONS:

Specific LNIT is a valide alternative to subcutaneous and sublingual administration. It is effective, safe, well tolerated by the patient, it can be done at home with fewer systemic reactions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólen / Rinite Alérgica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólen / Rinite Alérgica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article