Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of veterans affairs and NIDILRR traumatic brain injury model systems participants with disorders of consciousness.
Hamilton, Janette A; Ketchum, Jessica M; Hammond, Flora M; Peterson, Michelle D; Zasler, Nathan D; Eapen, Blessen C; Adamson, Maheen Mausoof; Galhorta, Pawan P; Harris, Odette; Nakase-Richardson, Risa.
Afiliação
  • Hamilton JA; Central Virginia VA Health Care System, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Ketchum JM; Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado.
  • Hammond FM; Department Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Carolinas Rehabilitation, 4141 Shore Drive 46254, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Peterson MD; Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Zasler ND; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Eapen BC; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Adamson MM; Department of Neurosurgery, Rehabilitation Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
  • Galhorta PP; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, Program Director, Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center.
  • Harris O; Department of Neurosurgery, Director, Brain Injury, Stanford University School of Medicine.
  • Nakase-Richardson R; Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Defense Health Agency TBI Center of Excellence at James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida.
Brain Inj ; 37(4): 282-292, 2023 03 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539996
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To characterize demographic, pre-injury, and outcome data within the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) and Veterans Affairs (VA) Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) cohorts with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with no command-following ability at time of admission to acute rehabilitation.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING:

NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) centers.

PARTICIPANTS:

396 NIDILRR and 72 VA participants without command-following ability who experienced TBI with subsequent Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Pre-injury and injury characteristics, rehabilitation outcomes, and 1-year self-reported outcomes.

RESULTS:

VA TBIMS cohort included individuals who were active duty or had military service before their injury. The VA cohort were more likely to be re-hospitalized at 1-year follow-up or residing in a long-term care or rehab setting. The NIDILRR TBIMS cohort had higher FIM and DRS scores at rehabilitation discharge, while the VA participants saw longer lengths of stay and higher numbers of "violent" injury types.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study allows for a better understanding of the comparability between VA and NIDILRR DoC cohorts providing guidance on how veteran and civilian samples might be merged in future TBIMS studies to explore predictors of recovery from a DoC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veteranos / Lesões Encefálicas / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veteranos / Lesões Encefálicas / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article