Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Strain Analysis in Cementless Hip Femoral Prosthesis using the Finite Element Method - Influence of the Variability of the Angular Positioning of the Implant.
Degasperi, Felipe Alberto; Scatigna, Bruno Francesco; Falótico, Guilherme Guadagnini; Romero, Valéria; Basile, Ricardo; Takata, Edmilson Takehiro.
Afiliação
  • Degasperi FA; Instituto ESSS de Educação, Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil.
  • Scatigna BF; Grupo de patologias do quadril adulto, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Falótico GG; Grupo de patologias do quadril adulto, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Romero V; Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
  • Basile R; Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Takata ET; Grupo de patologias do quadril adulto, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) ; 57(6): 968-974, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36540742
ABSTRACT
Objective The present study aims to evaluate the influence of different positioning of the hip femoral prosthesis on the stress and strain over this implant. Methods A femoral prosthesis (Taper - Víncula, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil) was submitted to a stress and strain analysis using the finite element method (FEM) according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7206-6 Implants for surgery - Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Part 6 Endurance properties testing and performance requirements of neck region of stemmed femoral components standard. The analysis proposed a branch of the physical test with a +/- 5° angle variation on the standard proposed for α and ß variables. Results The isolated +/- 5° variation on the α angle, as well as the association of +/- 5° variation on the α and ß angles, presented significant statistical differences compared with the control strain ( p = 0.027 and 0.021, respectively). Variation on angle ß alone did not result in a significant change in the strain of the prosthesis ( p = 0.128). The stem positioning with greatest implant strain was α = 5° and ß = 14° ( p = 0.032). Conclusion A variation on the positioning of the prosthetic femoral stem by +/- 5° in the coronal plane and/or the association of a +/- 5° angle in coronal and sagittal planes significantly influenced implant strain.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article