Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Referrals, access, and equity of monoclonal antibodies for outpatient COVID-19: A qualitative study of clinician perspectives.
Hamer, Mika K; Alasmar, Ahmed; Kwan, Bethany M; Wynia, Matthew K; Ginde, Adit A; DeCamp, Matthew W.
Afiliação
  • Hamer MK; Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
  • Alasmar A; Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
  • Kwan BM; Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
  • Wynia MK; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Ginde AA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • DeCamp MW; Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(50): e32191, 2022 Dec 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36550877
Neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatments for non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have been available since November 2020. However, they have been underutilized and access has been inequitable. To understand, from the clinician perspective, the factors facilitating or hindering monoclonal antibody referrals, patient access, and equity to inform development of clinician-focused messages, materials, and processes for improving access to therapeutics for COVID-19 in Colorado. We interviewed 38 frontline clinicians with experience caring for patients with COVID-19 in outpatient settings. Clinicians were purposely sampled for diversity to understand perspectives across geography (i.e., urban versus rural), practice setting, specialty, and self-reported knowledge about monoclonal antibodies. Interviews were conducted between June and September 2021, lasted 21 to 62 minutes, and were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interview transcripts were then analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis to identify thematic content and to compare themes across practice settings and other variables. Clinicians perceived monoclonal antibodies to be highly effective and were unconcerned about their emergency use status; hence, these factors were not perceived to hinder patient referrals. However, some barriers to access - including complex and changing logistics for referring, as well as the time and facilities needed for an infusion - inhibited widespread use. Clinicians in small, independent, and rural practices experienced unique challenges, such as lack of awareness of their patients' COVID-19 test results, disconnect from treatment distribution systems, and patients who faced long travel times to obtain treatment. Many clinicians held a persistent belief that monoclonal antibodies were in short supply; this belief hindered referrals, even when monoclonal antibody doses were not scarce. Across practice settings, the most important facilitator for access to monoclonal antibodies was linkage of COVID-19 testing and treatment within care delivery. Although clinicians viewed monoclonal antibodies as safe and effective treatments for COVID-19, individual- and system-level barriers inhibited referrals, particular in some practice settings. Subcutaneous or oral formulations may overcome certain barriers to access, but simplifying patient access by linking testing with delivery of treatments that reduce morbidity and mortality will be critical for the ongoing response to COVID-19 and in future pandemics.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatoriais / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article