Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A machine learning-Based model to predict early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients: A large cohort of 16,189 patients.
Xiong, Fan; Cao, Xuyong; Shi, Xiaolin; Long, Ze; Liu, Yaosheng; Lei, Mingxing.
Afiliação
  • Xiong F; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, People's Hospital of Macheng City, Huanggang, China.
  • Cao X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Shi X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Long Z; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Lei M; Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 10: 1059597, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568969
Purpose: This study aims to develop a prediction model to categorize the risk of early death among breast cancer patients with bone metastases using machine learning models. Methods: This study examined 16,189 bone metastatic breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2019 from a large oncological database in the United States. The patients were divided into two groups at random in a 90:10 ratio. The majority of patients (n = 14,582, 90%) were served as the training group to train and optimize prediction models, whereas patients in the validation group (n = 1,607, 10%) were utilized to validate the prediction models. Four models were introduced in the study: the logistic regression model, gradient boosting tree model, decision tree model, and random forest model. Results: Early death accounted for 17.4% of all included patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that older age; a separated, divorced, or widowed marital status; nonmetropolitan counties; brain metastasis; liver metastasis; lung metastasis; and histologic type of unspecified neoplasms were significantly associated with more early death, whereas a lower grade, a positive estrogen receptor (ER) status, cancer-directed surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were significantly the protective factors. For the purpose of developing prediction models, the 12 variables were used. Among all the four models, the gradient boosting tree had the greatest AUC [0.829, 95% confident interval (CI): 0.802-0.856], and the random forest (0.828, 95% CI: 0.801-0.855) and logistic regression (0.819, 95% CI: 0.791-0.847) models came in second and third, respectively. The discrimination slopes for the three models were 0.258, 0.223, and 0.240, respectively, and the corresponding accuracy rates were 0.801, 0.770, and 0.762, respectively. The Brier score of gradient boosting tree was the lowest (0.109), followed by the random forest (0.111) and logistic regression (0.112) models. Risk stratification showed that patients in the high-risk group (46.31%) had a greater six-fold chance of early death than those in the low-risk group (7.50%). Conclusion: The gradient boosting tree model demonstrates promising performance with favorable discrimination and calibration in the study, and this model can stratify the risk probability of early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article