Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laboratory Cross-Comparison and Ring Test Trial for Tumor BRCA Testing in a Multicenter Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Series: The BORNEO GEICO 60-0 Study.
Garcia-Casado, Zaida; Oaknin, Ana; Mendiola, Marta; Alkorta-Aranburu, Gorka; Antunez-Lopez, Jose Ramon; Moreno-Bueno, Gema; Palacios, Jose; Yubero, Alfonso; Marquez, Raul; Gallego, Alejandro; Sanchez-Heras, Ana Beatriz; Lopez-Guerrero, Jose Antonio; Perez-Segura, Cristina; Barretina-Ginesta, Pilar; Alarcon, Jesus; Gaba, Lydia; Marquez, Antonia; Matito, Judit; Cueva, Juan; Palacio, Isabel; Iglesias, Maria; Arcusa, Angels; Sanchez-Lorenzo, Luisa; Guerra-Alia, Eva; Romero, Ignacio; Vivancos, Ana.
Afiliação
  • Garcia-Casado Z; Molecular Biology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, 46009 Valencia, Spain.
  • Oaknin A; Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Instituto de Oncologia, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mendiola M; Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Alkorta-Aranburu G; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Antunez-Lopez JR; CIMA LAB Diagnostics/Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
  • Moreno-Bueno G; Molecular Biology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago, 15706 Santiago, Spain.
  • Palacios J; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Yubero A; Fundacion MD Anderson, 28033 Madrid, Spain.
  • Marquez R; Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas 'Alberto Sols. Conexion Cancer (UAM-CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM), IdiPAZ, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Gallego A; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanchez-Heras AB; Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
  • Lopez-Guerrero JA; Faculty of Medicine, Alcala University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.
  • Perez-Segura C; Instituto Ramon y Cajal for Health Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain.
  • Barretina-Ginesta P; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
  • Alarcon J; Fundacion MD Anderson, 28033 Madrid, Spain.
  • Gaba L; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
  • Marquez A; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain.
  • Matito J; Molecular Biology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, 46009 Valencia, Spain.
  • Cueva J; Universidad Catolica de Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
  • Palacio I; Unidad Mixta de Investigacion en Cancer IVO-CIPF, 46009 Valencia, Spain.
  • Iglesias M; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau i Santa Tecla, 43003 Tarragona, Spain.
  • Arcusa A; Medical Oncology Department, Institut Catala d'Oncologia Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
  • Sanchez-Lorenzo L; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
  • Guerra-Alia E; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Romero I; Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIMA, 29010 Malaga, Spain.
  • Vivancos A; Cancer Genomics Lab, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
J Pers Med ; 12(11)2022 Nov 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36579549
ABSTRACT
Germline and tumor BRCA testing constitutes a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Tissue testing is able to identify both germline (g) and somatic (s) BRCA variants, but tissue preservation methods and the widespread implementation of NGS represent pre-analytical and analytical challenges that need to be managed. This study was carried out on a multicenter prospective GEICO cohort of EOC patients with known gBRCA status in order to determine the inter-laboratory reproducibility of tissue sBRCA testing. The study consisted of two independent experimental approaches, a bilateral comparison between two reference laboratories (RLs) testing 82 formalin-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOC samples each, and a Ring Test Trial (RTT) with five participating clinical laboratories (CLs) evaluating the performance of tissue BRCA testing in a total of nine samples. Importantly, labs employed their own locally adopted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analytical approach. BRCA mutation frequency in the RL sub-study cohort was 23.17% 12 (63.1%) germline and 6 (31.6%) somatic. Concordance between the two RLs with respect to BRCA status was 84.2% (gBRCA 100%). The RTT study distributed a total of nine samples (three commercial synthetic human FFPE references, three FFPE, and three OC DNA) among five CLs. The median concordance detection rate among them was 64.7% (range 35.3-70.6%). Analytical discrepancies were mainly due to the minimum variant allele frequency thresholds, bioinformatic pipeline filters, and downstream variant interpretation, some of them with consequences of clinical relevance. Our study demonstrates a wide range of concordance in the identification and interpretation of BRCA sequencing data, highlighting the relevance of establishing standard criteria for detecting, interpreting, and reporting BRCA variants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article