Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study.
Kauppila, Joonas H; Rosenlund, Helen; Klevebro, Fredrik; Johar, Asif; Anandavadivelan, Poorna; Mälberg, Kalle; Lagergren, Pernilla.
Afiliação
  • Kauppila JH; Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden joonas.kauppila@ki.se.
  • Rosenlund H; Department of Surgery, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
  • Klevebro F; Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Johar A; Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyds Sjukhus AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Anandavadivelan P; Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mälberg K; Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lagergren P; Surgical Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e058763, 2022 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581984
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) are associated with better nutritional status and less weight loss 1 year after surgery, compared with open oesophagectomy (OE). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: All patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden during 2013-2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 424 patients alive at 1 year after surgery were eligible, and 281 completed the 1-year assessment. Of these, 239 had complete clinical data and were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, assessed using the abbreviated Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included postoperative weight loss at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 78 underwent MIE, 74 HMIE while 87 patients underwent OE. The MIE group had the highest prevalence of malnutrition (42% vs 22% after HMIE vs 25% after OE), reduced food intake (63% vs 45% after HMIE vs 39% after OE), symptoms reducing food intake (60% vs 45% after HMIE vs 60% after OE) and abnormal activities/function (45% vs 32% after HMIE vs 43% after OE). After adjustment for confounders, MIE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of reduced food intake 1 year after surgery (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.61), compared with OE. Other outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the groups. No statistically significant associations were observed between surgical techniques and weight loss up to 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MIE was statistically significantly associated with reduced food intake 1 year after surgery. However, no differences were observed in weight loss between the surgical techniques. Further studies on nutritional impact of surgical techniques in oesophageal cancer are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article