Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Item-Level Change Complements the Reliable Change Method.
Scarlett, Emily; Lu, Lisa H; Cummings, Latiba D; Bowles, Amy O.
Afiliação
  • Scarlett E; Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center (Mss Scarlett and Cummings and Drs Lu and Bowles), and Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency (Dr Lu), JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, Maryland (Ms Scarlett); and General Dynamic Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia (Dr Lu).
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 38(4): E312-E317, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602279
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine correspondence between the statistically derived 8-point reliable change index for the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) against clinically significant item-level change in symptom severity from intake to discharge for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

SETTING:

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service at Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas. PATIENTS In total, 655 active-duty service members with a diagnosis of mTBI who received treatment and completed self-report measures between 2007 and 2020.

DESIGN:

Observational retrospective analysis of outpatient clinical outcomes data. MAIN

MEASURES:

NSI total score change was used to divide patients into responder and nonresponders based on whether they met an 8-point decrease between intake and discharge. In addition, patients who had at least one NSI item that changed from a rating of 3 (severe) or 4 (very severe) at intake to a rating of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at discharge were coded as an individual with significant item-level change.

RESULTS:

Forty-five percent of the sample had significant item-level change and were classified as responders according to the reliable change method. Eight percent of the sample had significant item-level change but did not meet the 8-point reliable change threshold. Fifteen percent of the sample did not experience significant item-level change but were classified as responders according to reliable change. Thirty-one percent did not meet either method's criterion for change. Classification agreement between the reliable change and item-level change methods was 76%, which was statistically significant ( = 181.32, P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

There is good correspondence between reliable change and item-level change on the NSI in this population. Reliable change is easily calculated and thus much more accessible than the item-level change method. There may be some situations where calculating item-level change may be helpful.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos / Concussão Encefálica / Lesões Encefálicas / Militares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos / Concussão Encefálica / Lesões Encefálicas / Militares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article