Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patterns and outcomes of COVID-19 donor utilization for heart transplant.
Vaidya, Gaurang Nandkishor; Anaya, Paul; Ignaszewski, Maya; Kolodziej, Andrew; Malyala, Rajasekhar; Sekela, Michael; Birks, Emma.
Afiliação
  • Vaidya GN; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Anaya P; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Ignaszewski M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Kolodziej A; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Malyala R; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Sekela M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Birks E; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 37(4): e14917, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36681878
BACKGROUND: The outcomes following COVID-19 positive donor (CPD) utilization for heart transplant are unknown. METHODS: UNOS database was analyzed for heart transplants performed from the declaration of COVID-19 pandemic until September 30, 2022. RESULT: Since the onset of pandemic, there were 9876 heart transplants reported. COVID-19 antigen or NAT results were available in 7698 adult donors within 14 days of donation, of which 177 (2.3%) were positive. There was no difference in recipient demographics, including age (COVID positive donor vs. negative: 55 vs. 56 years, p = .2) and BMI. Listing status 1 and 2 were similar in both groups (7% vs. 10% and 48% vs. 49% respectively, p = .4). Durable and temporary mechanical support were similar in both groups pre-transplant (both groups 33%, p = .9). There was no difference in days on the waitlist (median 31 days, p = .9). Simultaneous renal transplant rates were similar (11% vs. 10%, p = .9). CPD utilization has increased since the onset of the pandemic, and the adoption is present across most UNOS regions. Post-transplant, there was no difference in length of stay (median 16 vs. 17 days, p = .9) and acute rejection episodes prior to discharge (3% vs. 8%, p = .1). In survival analysis of 90-day follow up, number of deaths reported were comparable (5% in both groups, p = .9) Follow-up LVEF was comparable (62% vs. 60%, p = .4). CONCLUSION: Active COVID-19 infection in donors did not affect survival or rejection rates in the short-term post-heart transplant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Coração / COVID-19 Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Coração / COVID-19 Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article