Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left ventricular assist device implantation and clinical outcomes in the Netherlands.
Damman, Kevin; Caliskan, Kadir; Birim, Ozcan; Kuijpers, Michiel; Otterspoor, Luuk C; Yazdanbakhsh, Aria; Palmen, Meindert; Ramjankhan, Faiz Z; Tops, Lauren F; van Laake, Linda W.
Afiliação
  • Damman K; University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. k.damman@umcg.nl.
  • Caliskan K; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Birim O; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kuijpers M; University of Groningen, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Otterspoor LC; Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Yazdanbakhsh A; OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Palmen M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Ramjankhan FZ; Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tops LF; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van Laake LW; Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Neth Heart J ; 31(5): 189-195, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36723773
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is an established treatment for advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with an LVAD in the Netherlands.

METHODS:

Patients implanted with an LVAD in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2020 were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics entered into this registry, as well as clinical outcomes (death on device, heart transplantation) and major adverse events (device dysfunction, major bleeding, major infection and cerebrovascular event), were evaluated.

RESULTS:

A total of 430 patients were implanted with an LVAD; mean age was 55 ± 13 years and 27% were female. The initial device strategy was bridge to transplant (BTT) in 50%, destination therapy (DT) in 29% and bridge to decision (BTD) in the remaining 21%. After a follow-up of 17 months, 97 (23%) patients had died during active LVAD support. Survival was 83% at 1 year, 76% at 2 years and 54% at 5 years. Patients implanted with an LVAD as a BTT had better outcomes compared with DT at all time points (1 year 86% vs 72%, 2 years 83% vs 59% and 5 years 58% vs 33%). Major adverse events were frequently observed, most often major infection, major bleeding and cerebrovascular events (0.84, 0.33 and 0.09 per patient-year at risk, respectively) and were similar across device strategies. Patients supported with HeartMate 3 had a lower incidence of major adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

Long-term survival on durable LVAD support in the Netherlands is over 50% after 5 years. Major adverse events, especially infection and bleeding, are still frequently observed, but decreasing with the contemporary use of HeartMate 3 LVAD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article