Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Public Perception of Ideal Areola Proportions.
Kuruvilla, Annet S; Kumar, Anish; Ibelli, Taylor J; Mandelbaum, Max; Greer, Madison; Henderson, Peter W.
Afiliação
  • Kuruvilla AS; From the Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Kumar A; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Ibelli TJ; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Mandelbaum M; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Greer M; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Henderson PW; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Ann Plast Surg ; 90(6S Suppl 5): S654-S658, 2023 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36752529
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In breast reconstruction, mastopexy, and breast reduction procedures, surgeons make decisions about the resulting areola size, and this significantly impacts the overall aesthetic result. Despite the importance of these decisions, little is known about the general population's preferences for areola size. The objective of this study was to survey the global population to better understand the public's perceptions of ideal areola dimensions.

METHODS:

A survey was developed with 9 different composite diagrams of a female torso (every combination of 3 breast widths and 3 waist widths). In each composite diagram, 6 different areola sizes were shown (areola-to-breast diameter ranging from 112 to 612). The survey was distributed via the Amazon Mechanical Turk digital platform, and respondents' demographics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, country, and state if located in the United States) and preferences for the most aesthetically pleasing size in each composite diagram were recorded.

RESULTS:

Among 2259 participants, with 1283 male (56.8%) and 976 female (43.2%), most participants were between 25 and 34 years old (1012, 44.8%), were from the United States (1669, 73.9%), and identified as White (1430, 63.3%). With 9 breast width and waist width combinations, the respondents were most likely to prefer the 212 (32.9%) areola-to-breast ratio ( P < 0.0001). The second most commonly preferred ratio was 312 (30.6%) ( P < 0.0001). Gender subgroup analysis showed that women preferred middle-range ratios, such as 212, 312, and 412 ( P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, men were more likely to prefer extreme ratios of 112 or 612 ( P < 0.0001). Across almost all races/ethnicities, 212 was significantly the most popular, except among American Indian/Alaskan Native and Middle Eastern where 312 was the most preferred ( P < 0.0001). Within the top 6 countries (United States, India, Brazil, Italy, Canada, United Kingdom), the United States, India, and Italy preferred 212, and Brazil, Canada, and the United Kingdom preferred 312 ( P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides the first objective data on public impressions of the ideal areola proportions and can serve as a guide for surgical decision making in breast reconstruction and reshaping procedures.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mamoplastia / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Mamilos Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mamoplastia / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Mamilos Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article