Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of Recall for Total Joint Arthroplasty Devices Over 10 Years.
DeRuyter, Matthew T; Mansy, LeiLani N; Krumme, John W; Cheng, An-Lin; Dubin, Jonathan R; Cil, Akin.
Afiliação
  • DeRuyter MT; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Mansy LN; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Krumme JW; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Cheng AL; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Dubin JR; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Cil A; University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(8): 1444-1448, 2023 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36773660
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Orthopaedic devices comprise nearly 20% of devices on the market and 12% to 20% of these devices undergo a recall within 10 years. More than 95% of these devices are approved without supporting clinical data through the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) pathway. The risk of recall of orthopaedic arthroplasty devices approved through the 510(k) pathway has not been previously studied.

METHODS:

The FDA 510(k) database was queried for orthopaedic devices approved between January 01, 2008 and December 31, 2018 and subsequently codified to hip and knee arthroplasty devices using product codes. The database included 904 arthroplasty devices during the study period, with hip and knee making up 53.7% (485) and 46.3% (419) of devices, respectively. Information regarding numbers, dates, and reasons for recall were recorded. Cumulative incidence function was conducted to compare the risk of recall between hip and knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS:

In total, 94 (19.4%) hip and 85 (20.3%) knee devices were recalled. The hazard of recall by 10 years for hip and knee arthroplasty devices was approximately 24%, with no statistical differences between each region. The most common causes of recall were process control and device design, accounting for 29.6% and 26.3% of recalls, respectively, with no significant difference between study groups.

CONCLUSION:

The risk of recall for arthroplasty devices is more than that previously understood. Improved postmarket surveillance strategies along with increased physician participation in detecting and reporting device safety issues are necessary to strengthen patient safety.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article