Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the rate of inferior vena cava filter retrieval through multidisciplinary engagement.
Stevens, Hannah; Bortz, Hadley; Chao, Sharon; Ramanan, Radha; Clements, Warren; Peter, Karlheinz; McFadyen, James D; Tran, Huyen.
Afiliação
  • Stevens H; Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bortz H; Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Chao S; Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ramanan R; Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Clements W; Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Peter K; Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • McFadyen JD; Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tran H; Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 7(1): 100040, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852111
Background: The placement of retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters occurs commonly, but retrieval rates remain low. Consequently, there is an unmet clinical need to ensure appropriate follow-up and retrieval of these devices. Objectives: To determine the association between an IVC filter surveillance team with filter retrievals or a documented filter plan, time to retrieval, and incidence of filter complications or recurrent venous thromboembolism. Methods: Ambidirectional cohort study evaluating consecutive IVC filter insertions before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary surveillance team (MDST). We report an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs, adjusted by age, sex, weight, and malignancy status. Results: Overall, 453 patients were included, with 272 individuals in the pre-MDST cohort and 181 individuals in the post-MDST cohort. The MDST was associated with a higher composite primary outcome of IVC filter retrieval or a documented filter plan from 79.4% in the pre-MDST cohort to 96.1% in the post-MDST cohort (OR, 6.44; 95% CI, 3.06-15.84). Compared with the pre-MDST cohort, IVC filter retrieval rates were higher in the post-MDST cohort (52.6%-73.5%, respectively; (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.67-3.78). The MDST was associated with a shorter median time-to-filter retrieval (187-150 days, hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.39-2.29), but there was no significant difference when comparing symptomatic or clinically significant IVC filter complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, or mortality. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the importance of a structured program to ensure timely IVC filter retrieval and ultimately improve patient care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article