Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interruption of imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after prolonged imatinib maintenance in the absence of gross tumor lesions.
Kang, Yoon-Koo; Kim, Hyung-Don; Kim, Hyun Jin; Park, Young Soo; Beck, Mo-Youl; Ryu, Min-Hee.
Afiliação
  • Kang YK; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. ykkang@amc.seoul.kr.
  • Kim HD; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park YS; Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Beck MY; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryu MH; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Gastric Cancer ; 26(4): 604-613, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36884149
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current guidelines recommend indefinite imatinib treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Imatinib-refractory progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were previously reported not to differ between GIST patients who interrupted imatinib and those who did not.

METHODS:

Clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic GIST who interrupted imatinib treatment after maintaining years of imatinib treatment in the absence of gross tumor lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between clinical factors and progression-free survival (PFS) following imatinib interruption were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The median time from the absence of gross tumor lesions to imatinib interruption was 61.5 months. Since imatinib interruption, the median PFS was 19.6 months, and 4 patients (26.3%) remained progression-free for longer than 5 years. Among the patients who had progressive disease following the interruption, imatinib re-introduction led to an 88.6% objective response rate and a 100% disease control rate. Complete removal of the initial gross tumor lesion(s) and complete removal of the residual gross tumor lesion(s) by local treatment (vs. no local treatment or residual lesions after local treatment) were independently associated with favorable PFS.

CONCLUSION:

Interruption of imatinib following prolonged maintenance in the absence of gross tumor lesions led to disease progression in the majority of cases. However, re-introduction of imatinib resulted in effective tumor control. Unmaintained remission seems to be possible in some patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST after a prolonged remission with imatinib if there is complete removal of any gross tumor lesions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article