Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review of co-creation practice in the development of non-pharmacological interventions for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A health CASCADE study.
An, Qingfan; Sandlund, Marlene; Agnello, Danielle; McCaffrey, Lauren; Chastin, Sebastien; Helleday, Ragnberth; Wadell, Karin.
Afiliação
  • An Q; Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Sweden. Electronic address: qingfan.an@umu.se.
  • Sandlund M; Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Sweden.
  • Agnello D; School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
  • McCaffrey L; School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
  • Chastin S; School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK; Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Helleday R; Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
  • Wadell K; Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Sweden.
Respir Med ; 211: 107193, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889517
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Incorporating co-creation processes may improve the quality of outcome interventions. However, there is a lack of synthesis of co-creation practices in the development of Non-Pharmacological Interventions (NPIs) for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), that could inform future co-creation practice and research for rigorously improving the quality of care.

OBJECTIVE:

This scoping review aimed to examine the co-creation practice used when developing NPIs for people with COPD.

METHODS:

This review followed Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework and was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR framework. The search included PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies reporting on the process and/or analysis of applying co-creation practice in developing NPIs for people with COPD were included.

RESULTS:

13 articles complied with the inclusion criteria. Limited creative methods were reported in the studies. Facilitators described in the co-creation practices included administrative preparations, diversity of stakeholders, cultural considerations, employment of creative methods, creation of an appreciative environment, and digital assistance. Challenges around the physical limitations of patients, the absence of key stakeholder opinions, a prolonged process, recruitment, and digital illiteracy of co-creators were listed. Most of the studies did not report including implementation considerations as a discussion point in their co-creation workshops.

CONCLUSION:

Evidence-based co-creation in COPD care is critical for guiding future practice and improving the quality of care delivered by NPIs. This review provides evidence for improving systematic and reproducible co-creation. Future research should focus on systematically planning, conducting, evaluating, and reporting co-creation practices in COPD care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article