Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Index lesion contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy - Evaluation of mismatch between radiologists and urologists.
Ghafoor, Soleen; Steinebrunner, Florian; Stocker, Daniel; Hötker, Andreas M; Schmid, Florian A; Eberli, Daniel; Donati, Olivio F.
Afiliação
  • Ghafoor S; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: soleen.ghafoor@usz.ch.
  • Steinebrunner F; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Stocker D; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hötker AM; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schmid FA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Eberli D; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Donati OF; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Radiology Hirslanden Zurich - Octorad, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol ; 162: 110763, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898172
PURPOSE: Mistargeting of focal lesions due to inaccurate segmentations can lead to false-negative findings on MRI-guided targeted biopsies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine inter-reader agreement of prostate index lesion segmentations from actual biopsy data between urologists and radiologists. METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Agreement between segmentations on T2w-images between urologists and radiologists was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95 % Hausdorff distance (95 % HD). Differences in similarity scores were compared using Wilcoxon test. Differences depending on lesion features (size, zonal location, PI-RADS scores, lesion distinctness) were tested with Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation with prostate signal-intensity homogeneity score (PSHS) and lesion size was tested with Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (mean age 64.9 ± 7.1y, median serum PSA 6.5 [4.33-10.00]) were included. Mean similarity scores were statistically significantly lower between urologists and radiologists compared to radiologists only (DSC 0.41 ± 0.24 vs. 0.59 ± 0.23, p < 0.01; 95 %HD 6.38 ± 5.45 mm vs. 4.47 ± 4.12 mm, p < 0.01). There was a moderate and strong positive correlation between DSC scores and lesion size for segmentations from urologists and radiologists (ρ = 0.331, p = 0.002) and radiologists only (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.001). Similarity scores were worse in lesions ≤ 10 mm while other lesion features did not significantly influence similarity scores. CONCLUSION: There is significant mismatch of prostate index lesion segmentations between urologists and radiologists. Segmentation agreement positively correlates with lesion size. PI-RADS scores, zonal location, lesion distinctness, and PSHS show no significant impact on segmentation agreement. These findings could underpin benefits of perilesional biopsies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article