Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Droperidol and Midazolam Versus Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Acute Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.
Allen, Patrick J; Johanson, Kendra E; Reveles, Kelly R; Neff, Luke A; Lock, Ashley E.
Afiliação
  • Allen PJ; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health, Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Johanson KE; Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Reveles KR; Pharmacotherapy Education & Research Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Neff LA; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services, University Health, Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Lock AE; Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ann Pharmacother ; 57(12): 1367-1374, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36999520
BACKGROUND: Acute agitation accounts for up to 2.6% of visits to the emergency department (ED). To date, a standard of care for the management of acute agitation has not been established. Few studies have evaluated antipsychotic and benzodiazepine combinations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for acute agitation with intramuscular (IM) droperidol and midazolam (D+M) compared with IM haloperidol and lorazepam (H+L) in patients in the ED. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective medical record review of patients presenting to a large, academic ED with acute agitation from July 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome was percentage of patients requiring additional agitation medication within 60 minutes of combination administration. Secondary outcomes included average time to repeat dose administration and average number of repeat doses required before ED discharge. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were included for analysis: 102 in the D+M group and 204 in the H+L group. Repeat dose within 60 minutes occurred in 7 (6.9%) and 28 (13.8%) patients in the D+M and H+L groups, respectively (P = 0.065). A total of 28.4% of D+M patients and 30.9% of H+L patients required any repeat dose during their ED visit. Time to repeat dose was 12 and 24 minutes in the D+M and H+L, respectively (P = 0.22). The adverse event rate was 2.9% in each group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IM D+M resulted in a lower rate of repeat doses of acute agitation medication compared with IM H+L, though this was not statistically significant. Both therapies were safe, and the adverse event rate was low.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antipsicóticos / Haloperidol Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antipsicóticos / Haloperidol Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article