Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ovarian preservation compared to oophorectomy in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial Cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hernandez-Zepeda, Miriam L; Munro, Elizabeth G; Caughey, Aaron B; Bruegl, Amanda S.
Afiliação
  • Hernandez-Zepeda ML; Oregon Health & Science Univesity, SW Sam Jackson Paarak Rd, 97339-3908 Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: hernamir@ohsu.edu.
  • Munro EG; Oregon Health & Science Univesity, SW Sam Jackson Paarak Rd, 97339-3908 Portland, OR, USA.
  • Caughey AB; Oregon Health & Science Univesity, SW Sam Jackson Paarak Rd, 97339-3908 Portland, OR, USA.
  • Bruegl AS; Oregon Health & Science Univesity, SW Sam Jackson Paarak Rd, 97339-3908 Portland, OR, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 173: 8-14, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37030073
OBJECTIVES: Standard treatment for endometrial cancer is a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph node assessment. In premenopausal women, removal of the ovaries may not be necessary and could increase the risk of all-cause mortality. We sought to estimate the outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of oophorectomy versus ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was designed using TreeAge software comparing oophorectomy to ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. We used a theoretical cohort of 10,600 women to represent our population of interest in the United States in 2021. Outcomes included cancer recurrences, ovarian cancer diagnoses, deaths, rates of vaginal atrophy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Oophorectomy resulted in more deaths and higher rates of vaginal atrophy, while ovarian preservation resulted in 100 cases of ovarian cancer. Ovarian preservation resulted in lower costs and higher QALYs making it cost effective when compared to oophorectomy. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the probability of cancer recurrence after ovarian preservation and probability of developing ovarian cancer were the most impactful variables in our model. CONCLUSION: Ovarian preservation is cost-effective in premenopausal women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer when compared to oophorectomy. Ovarian preservation may prevent surgical menopause, which may improve quality of life and overall mortality without compromising oncologic outcomes, and should be strongly considered in premenopausal women with early stage disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article