Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections at the Time of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Men with Severe Storage Symptoms.
Huang, Mitchell M; Dean, Nicholas S; Assmus, Mark A; Lee, Matthew S; Guo, Jenny N; Krambeck, Amy E.
Afiliação
  • Huang MM; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Dean NS; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Assmus MA; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lee MS; Division of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Guo JN; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Krambeck AE; Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Endourol ; 37(7): 801-806, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37053094
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (OTA) injection is a well-established treatment option for refractory overactive bladder; however, its use at the time of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for men with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and severe storage symptoms has not been previously reported. Materials and

Methods:

We retrospectively identified men with BOO and severe storage symptoms who underwent treatment with 200 U of intradetrusor OTA (Botox®) at the time of HoLEP. Patients were propensity score matched to a cohort of HoLEP-only patients based on age, Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI) score, preoperative urinary retention, urge incontinence, and prostate size. Perioperative, postoperative, and patient-reported outcomes were examined between groups.

Results:

We identified 82 men who underwent HoLEP, including 41 patients in the OTA group and 41 patients in the control group. There was no difference in operative times (59 minutes OTA vs 55 minutes control, p = 0.2), rates of same-day trial of void (TOV) (92% OTA vs 94% control, p = 0.7), or rates of same-day discharge (88% OTA vs 85% control, p = 0.6) between groups. There was no difference in temporary postoperative urinary retention (7% OTA vs 2% control, p = 0.3) between groups. Patients who received OTA injections had a significant reduction in their incontinence scores at 3-month follow-up (M-ISI -8, interquartile range [IQR] -13 to 0, p < 0.001), whereas control patients did not (M-ISI -5, IQR -8 to -1, p = 0.2). There was no difference in rates of 90-day complications between groups (OTA 10% vs control 5%, p = 0.7).

Conclusions:

Intradetrusor OTA at the time of HoLEP is safe and is associated with improved urinary incontinence scores and AUA Symptom Score. Rates of same-day discharge and same-day TOV after HoLEP were not affected by OTA. These findings support the role of OTA as an adjunct to surgical intervention in men with incontinence in the presence of BOO.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinência Urinária / Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinência Urinária / Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article